Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Action Needed: ODFW Coastal Management Plan fails to protect wild fish
The draft Coastal salmonid Management Plan (CMP) is available for comment until February 10. The CMP was developed by ODFW staff with limited public input, and is primarily a hatchery and harvest plan that is designed to continue most of the current management practices. It is scientifically suspect, and represents a high risk for wild fish on much of the Oregon coast.
A more detailed article will appear in the Osprey soon.
A series of public meetings begins January 16 in Salem.
To review the Coastal Management Plan (CMP), and see the schedule of public meetings, and the results of an independent review of the CMP report go to:
Comments can be mailed to ODFW or submitted via email. Comments must be submitted before February 10th.
Email comments to:
Thoughts on ODFW's Coastal plan from Joe Ferguson of the Steamboaters:
ODFW is under considerable pressure from elected officials and a large segment of the sport fishing population to provide fish for consumption and not to focus on protection and recovery of wild fish. It is past time for Oregon to move towards protection/recovery of wild fish, and the draft CMP fails in this regard.
The draft CMP was reviewed by two separate scientific groups, with parallel findings: The Independent Multi-Disciplinary Scientific Team (IMST), authorized by the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds (15 pages, available on ODFW’s CMP website); and a separate Panel assembled by Steamboaters and the Native Fish Society consisting of Steven Cramer & Associates, Chuck Huntington, and Dr. Chris Frissel (30 pages, key points are itemized on pp 3 & 4).
NFS will post on their website shortly.
From the IMST report (p 1):
“....we have major concerns that the CMP places excess faith in hatcheries, makes multiple assumptions with minimal data if any, (and) limits discussion to the pressures that ODFW can regulate thereby omitting major
land use and socioeconomic pressures....”
Critical shortcomings of the plan:
1) There is no comprehensive plan designed to benefit wild fish.
2) Hatchery impacts are not considered a primary or secondary limiting factor for wild fish populations. Hatchery planting increases from 6 million to 6.3 million.
3) Impacts to wild fish habitat from climate change (both freshwater and ocean), O&C legislation, and human population increases on the coast are ignored.
4) There is no plan for habitat protection or improvement. Impacts to habitat are not defined; habitat improvement is left for others to accomplish with little guidance.
5) The monitoring plan lacks both specificity and the necessary funding.
6) Chum salmon and spring chinook are at risk, and anadromous cutthroat populations are depressed. The CMP devotes minimal effort towards recovery of any of these.
I urge you to read these scientific reviews and contact the department and the Commission with your concerns.
Please take a few minutes to contact ODFW and weigh in on the draft Coastal Management Plan.